2nd Quarter Fiscal Update: No news is bad news


  • No material change to deficit
  • Meaningful reduction in amount of capital grants and capital investment
  • Weaker tax revenue
  • Spending creeps up

On 28 November, Treasury Board President and Finance Minister, Joe Ceci released the 2nd Quarter Update .  The bottom line deficit, forecast at $10.497 billion in April’s budget, is now estimated to be $10.314 billion. Although the economic update was upbeat- the economy resuming growth of an estimated four per cent- the fiscal situation remains sobering.

The narrative in the ministry has shifted somewhat in the past three months. Mr. Ceci has spoken out about the importance of low salary settlements with public sector unions.  The Premier has talked about “compassionate cuts.”

Capital Plan

It is evident that the government has now discovered the big “painless” expenditure cuts can be found in capital budgets.  These budgets have been pruned by a total of $883 million.  The report attributes the reduction to “re-profiling of school, municipal, health and post-secondary facilities, continuing care, housing and other projects to future years, and savings on projects, partly offset by increases related to projects carried over from 2016 -17.”

This re-profiling has two significant implications.  Firstly, it borrows a leaf from the Klein cutback years of the mid-nineties when capital spending was reduced as part of the deficit elimination and debt elimination plan. Secondly, the deferral reduces financial requirements by $1.3 billion. The rationale?  With the economy recovering, it is time to lift the governmental foot off the capital spend accelerator. And indeed, there is merit in this and we anticipate that Budget 2018 will include a sharper re-profiling of capital projects.  This will be part of a “credible” plan to reduce spending and borrowing requirements. Nevertheless, operating spending, especially, health and education,  consuming a whopping 72 per cent of operating spending, will remain the chief budgetary nut to crack.


In spite of the promising economic outlook, the return to positive employment performance, and return to profitability by oil companies, tax revenue fell by $503 million from budget. Personal tax revenue was down $339 million from budget and the tobacco tax declined from budget by $98 million. Personal taxes, expected to be higher due to increases on higher income earners, disappointed.  This lower take is probably due to high earners’ capacity to move various forms of income into a lower 2016 tax year.

Bitumen royalties came in $671 million lower than expected.  Assumptions for Hardisty crude were moved to $47.13 per barrel from $51.30 and natural gas from $2.90/GJ to $2.20/GJ. However, conventional crude and bonuses and sales of Crown leases were higher, netting the royalty sub-total $96 million higher than budgeted. Another positive has been investment earnings expected to be nearly $300 million higher.  A leading revenue item that has improved are motor vehicle license revenues which were up by $20 million. This line item is highly sensitive to economic developments and is a precursor to improvements in the retail sales environment.

Net income from government business enterprises is $120 million lower than budget.  While ATB Financial projects higher earnings, the Balancing Pool is going to become a constant drain as payments to retire the Power Purchasing Agreements come home to roost.

Operating Spending

The report highlighted efforts to manage spending including :

  • Elimination or amalgamation of a number of agencies, boards and commissions
  • Consolidation of common functions across government, such as IT, finance and communications
  • Limiting discretionary spending and restraining hiring
  • Examining best practices to find efficiencies, such as reducing health drug costs .
  • Salaries for management, including in agencies, and for political staff, have been frozen for several years, or cut . Bargaining in various  sectors underway is being pursued with goals of protecting jobs and programs, through an affordable public service.

Unlike capital spending, where “realized savings” are in the hundreds of millions of dollars, operating expenses have been sliced by tens of millions. It is unlikely that the government will be able to reduce spending significantly unless it makes hard choices to reduce or eliminate programs.  Given a provincial election is less than 18 months away, such policy choices become politically difficult.

Despite funding, initiative fails to shrink class sizes27-2-18 EJ

Superintendents dispute updated pay raise report27-2-18 EJ

Province, health workers’ union reach tentative agreement27-2-18 EJ

Auditor general blasts province on oversight lapses23-2-18 EJ

NDP’s Banff retreat expected to focus on belt-tightening25-1-18 EJ

Alberta party leadership debate a civil affair25-1-18 EJ

Time for Alberta to begin restoring its tax advantage23-1-18 EJ

Alberta gaming revenues drop for second year9-1-18 EJ

Nurses union’s tentative deal includes two-year wage freeze9-1-18 EJ

Letter Headline on expenses article misses the point6-1-18 EJ

$10,000 buffet tops expenses4-1-18 EJ

UCP still vows to repeal carbon tax increase2-1-18 EJ

Province’s $37B borrowing plan includes ‘prudent’ $5B reserve23-12-17 EJ

Oil and gas drilling rights sales add $504 million to treasury21-12-17 EJ

Public libraries smart economic investments20-12-17 EJ

Public libraries are not the place to cut costs16-12-17 EJ

Ways to trim costs without being ‘reckless’12-12-17 EJ

School districts asked to reduce out-of-class expenses13-12-17 EJ

Ways to trim costs without being ‘reckless’12-12-17 EJ

Universities, boards ordered to tighten belts12-12-17 EJ

‘Alberta is back in the saddle’- finance minister29-11-17 EJ

PST off the table because Albertans don’t want it-Ceci1-12-17 EJ


This entry was posted in Budget on by .

About albertarecessionwatch

Former Director, Institute for Public Economics, University of Alberta and currently Fellow of the Institute. Former executive with Alberta Treasury Branches. Worked for the Alberta government for 12 years with Federal and Intergovernmental Affairs and Alberta Treasury. Areas of focus: financial institutions legislation and policy, government borrowing, and relations with credit rating agencies. Ph.D in Political Science (Uof A), Masters of Public Administration and BComm. (Carleton University). Author of Politics and Public Debt: The Dominion, the Banks and Alberta's Social Credit. Presently working on study of Alberta provincial agency board appointments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s